Pages

You Just Can't Make This Up!

Creationist Kent Hovind is debunking the claim that the Earth is flat!  

(This the first of several videos, but do you really want to watch them?)


I guess it's a form of progress!

Russia's Radioactive River Revisited


The U.S. National Cancer Institute has an ongoing study of the population in the area.

Friday, April 29, 2016

Some More Radiation Biology

From the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission.  I wish the speaker hadn't included hormesis or referred to LNT as a hypothesis.  But she did.  Otherwise, pretty well done:


The INWORKS Study

Here's the study, mentioned in the video within my previous post.

Funny, I've never heard a DeNiAr mention it!




The Health Physics Society Is SORRY

Oops, I meant SARI.  On page 16 of the May, 2016 newsletter it says:

"Sunday evening concluded with dinner at the Hotel Santa Fe (where the chocolate cake is deadly!) and a fascinating talk by Mark L. Miller, CHP, PhD. Mark discussed his involvement with Scientists for Accurate Radiation Information (SARI) and concerns about the harm done by endorsing the linear no-threshold (LNT) theory."

Hello!  A scientific theory is a scientific theory!  You overturn a theory with evidence!  If you don't have the evidence to overturn it, you endorse it.  That's how science works.

The consequences of accepting a scientific theory, have to be dealt with.  But one doesn't deal with the consequences by denying the science.

50 Years Of Scientific Challenges To Evolution

And none have succeeded to overthrow the theory, you IDiots:



Climate Change Denier "Teaches" At University

That would be the scholarly Prager University, on YouTube.  Richard Lindzen, you won't earn any Nobel Prizes by misleading people on YouTube.  But, then, science is not your speciality:


Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Merchants Of Doubt

From one of the book's authors, Naomi Oreskes.  The interview is from 2014, but the videos recently posted :





American Nuclear Society Promotes DeNiAl

They reprinted some propaganda from DeNiAr James Conca which first appeared on that wonderful, scholarly scientific journal/website Forbes.  I responded within the Forbes masterpiece (I won't link to it here) and I responded to the ANS website.

My comment asked the question as whether or not the ANS really wanted to promote science denial.

My comment has been held in moderation.

So I guess my question has been answered.