Radiation Hormesis: Where Lack Of Evidence = Evidence

I'm referring to this abstract and its related paper (click on paper on right hand side).  Basically, the author is saying that if he adjusts the ERR curve a particular way, then it looks like radiation hormesis is evident from the atomic bomb survivor data.  Why should the curve be adjusted that way?  He provides no evidence, other than it gives him the result he wants.

Of course, this was published in the pseudo-science journal of the International Hormesis Dose Response Society.

This is just another denialist repeat.