I Should Have Been A Civil Engineer

It's Arnie Gundersen with information "he's been wanting to share with you for a long time".  But for some reason, he couldn't post a YouTube video until now.

Call me skeptical.


You gotta love the bogus connection between automobile air filters, and human lungs.  There isn't one.   Particle size deposition in the lung is not the same as particle size deposition in air filters.  "Breathing" rates are not the same.  Car filters don't actively clear contaminants, while the human respiratory tract does.

And next is shoe laces?  I've heard of grabbing for straws....now we're grabbing for shoe laces!  How often do kids tie their shoes?  How "radioactive" do their hands get?  And how does it magically get into their GI tract as opposed to up their nose while they're "digging for gold"?

The Boston/Seattle chart shown at about 2:30 is interesting.  If Japan is to our West, I can understand looking at results in Seattle.  But why Boston?  Why did Boston show "positive" results, but "All other USA filters were negative".  This begs for an explanation, but the inconsistency is ignored.

Mr. Gundersen say, "I think we have two problems here". 

I agree.

One is Mr. Gundersen.  And the other is Mr. Kaltofen.

And what about the difference between a personal health issue and a public health issue?  If this is a widespread problem, which is the point being made, then these are the same issues.  They are different issues if the problem is limited (temporally or geographically).

And Mr. Kaltofen, since you are a scientist, in what peer-reviewed journal did you publish your paper?

Let me guess....you didn't.