Search This Blog

Thursday, April 28, 2016

Chernobyl = Pompeii

More or less.

The Health Physics Society Is SORRY

Oops, I meant SARI.  On page 16 of the May, 2016 newsletter it says:

"Sunday evening concluded with dinner at the Hotel Santa Fe (where the chocolate cake is deadly!) and a fascinating talk by Mark L. Miller, CHP, PhD. Mark discussed his involvement with Scientists for Accurate Radiation Information (SARI) and concerns about the harm done by endorsing the linear no-threshold (LNT) theory."

Hello!  A scientific theory is a scientific theory!  You overturn a theory with evidence!  If you don't have the evidence to overturn it, you endorse it.  That's how science works.

The consequences of accepting a scientific theory, have to be dealt with.  But one doesn't deal with the consequences by denying the science.

50 Years Of Scientific Challenges To Evolution

And none have succeeded to overthrow the theory, you IDiots:

Climate Change Denier "Teaches" At University

That would be the scholarly Prager University, on YouTube.  Richard Lindzen, you won't earn any Nobel Prizes by misleading people on YouTube.  But, then, science is not your speciality:

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Merchants Of Doubt

From one of the book's authors, Naomi Oreskes.  The interview is from 2014, but the videos recently posted :

What's It Like To Live Near Chernobyl Today?

Nice photos.  (Notice the article includes the 4,000 death estimate! HA!)

American Nuclear Society Promotes DeNiAl

They reprinted some propaganda from DeNiAr James Conca which first appeared on that wonderful, scholarly scientific journal/website Forbes.  I responded within the Forbes masterpiece (I won't link to it here) and I responded to the ANS website.

My comment asked the question as whether or not the ANS really wanted to promote science denial.

My comment has been held in moderation.

So I guess my question has been answered.