Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Philosophy of Science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philosophy of Science. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Merchants Of Doubt

From one of the book's authors, Naomi Oreskes.  The interview is from 2014, but the videos recently posted :





Thursday, September 24, 2015

Here's A Video For DeNiArs

It discusses the difference between theories, hypotheses and laws.

Because one of the DeNiAr's ploys is to refer to the "LNT hypothesis".  

They're either too dumb to know the difference, or they think you're too dumb to know the difference.

Either way, they suck.


Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Manufacturing Doubt

A video, dealing primarily with global warming, but it applies to radiation, tobacco, etc.:


Thursday, September 3, 2015

Pollution Is Not Good For You

A review of the book, "Is A Little Pollution Good For You?" by Kevin C. Elliot which focuses on the flaws of hormesis from a philosophical perspective.

I just bought the book and have started reading it.

Saturday, August 29, 2015

HPS Newsletter Publicly Available

The Health Physics Society has made their monthly newsletter available for public consumption.

I read the Boice Report within it.  It is John Boice's personal take on LNT.

I felt compelled to write him an email - pertinent parts below the fold.

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

The NRC Petition Against LNT (Science) Will Fail

So a bunch of petitioners (they refer to themselves as scientists, but they aren't doing science, they're petitioning) petitioned the NRC to ignore the theory of LNT when it promulgates regulations.

Can you imagine if a another bunch of ideologues petitioned the FDA to ignore the germ theory of disease when it promulgates its regulations?


Saturday, December 13, 2014

I Agree With Mark Kermode

I don't even know who he is, but he has reviewed the documentary, "Merchants of Doubt" and he finds the subject enraging.  As do I:


Saturday, November 15, 2014

Science Denial Charts Are Insufficient

Chris Mooney has a post in which he charts the influence of politics and religion on science denial.

At the end, he concludes that our sense of personal identity is the major influence.

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Virgin Galactic Spaceship Crash

Have you heard about the crash?

What if the company's CEO, Sir Richard Branson, had appeared on T.V. and said something like:

"This is a tragedy.  Please join me in signing a letter denouncing the science of physics, particularly the horrible theory of general relativity (our theory of gravity).  We mustn't let this happen again.  A pilot was killed and another injured.  The costs have been in the millions.  Please denounce general relativity."

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Jesus...The "Science Isn't Incompatible With Faith" Delusion Again

In the Atlantic dealing with the Pope's views on evolution.

The author completely ignores a fundamental Catholic myth.

That Jesus had to die in order to get forgiveness for Original Sin (Adam & Eve stuff).

If Adam & Eve didn't exist (they didn't) and Original Sin never happened (it didn't), then Catholicism blows up.  The whole Jesus myth becomes even more nonsensical.

Someone should tell the author that the reason the Pontifical Academy of Sciences exists is because faith is incompatible with science.   They need THEIR version of science, instead of an objective version of science.

And what about that wafer turning into the flesh of Jesus after one eats it?  Is that science?

Zombie worship isn't science.