In the New York Times. Of course, they discuss two sides to several point. And add:
"There is considerable disagreement among scientists over whether such catastrophes are possible. But some argue that whether the chances are small or large, changes should be made quickly because of the magnitude of the potential calamity."
That's not true. Certain catastrophes are possible (like another earthquake) others are not (like the fuel catching fire). Journalists need to do better.
No comments:
Post a Comment