The physician should not have entered this debate. Scientific matters are debated in the scientific arena using peer-reviewed studies. There is a democracy of process (anyone can participate) but not of outcome (the best ideas win).
There is no reason to pay attention to the HI. They either need to accept the consensus or get to work on producing evidence, not holding debates. They have failed on both accounts. If the experts don't accept their ideas, if you are a non-expert, why should you?
No comments:
Post a Comment