Ah, the guy is leaning over backward for a reason. The reason being that the Forbes readership is receptive to climatology denial, so any argument to the contrary must have its i's crossed and its t's dotted.
Note also that he is criticising here a fellow contributor to Forbes, James M Taylor. You want to be extra careful then...
Ah, the guy is leaning over backward for a reason. The reason being that the Forbes readership is receptive to climatology denial, so any argument to the contrary must have its i's crossed and its t's dotted.
ReplyDeleteNote also that he is criticising here a fellow contributor to Forbes, James M Taylor. You want to be extra careful then...
Patrick J. Michaels of the Cato Institute, another denier, also "contributes" to Forbes.
ReplyDelete