"My colleagues at the Discovery Institute are routinely accused of being anti-science for promoting intelligent design (as they are in Campbell’s article), which ID opponents often mislabel as creationism. But ID is methodologically science. Its adherents are exploring the profoundly heterodox hypothesis that the natural world is better explained by a directing force than the almost universally accepted explanation of random causes and purposeless natural selection."
No ID is not methodological science. There are no experiments and no testable predictions.
It's just that some things look designed to some people. That's as far as it goes.
No comments:
Post a Comment